Correspondence Analysis
The above cautions being said, it is the opinion of this author that the "vector" interpretation in general terms of more and less association between data points is a permissible one and will not lead one far astray. That is, the more a brand tends to lie in a similar direction away from the centroid as an attribute, the higher should be that brand's profile on that attribute.
The first paragraph discussion is in reference to the 'joint display' scaling option. The CGS scaling purports to allow true interpoint comparisons to be made, but this scaling, in turn, has been criticized (see references). In effect, the CGS scaling stretches the second (vertical) axis relative to that shown by the joint display. In the 'asymmetric scalings' the plotted column points are the weighted centroids of the row points or vice versa.
It should be noted that a map sharing certain characteristics of a correspondence map (that is that the map is of the 'profiles' of the data, with the overall size effect being removed) can be produced by requesting a BiPlot with the "Dev. from expcted value" option.
Correspondence map interpretation
Copyright © 1994 - 2017 WRC Research Systems, Inc.
Still need help? Please email us with any questions .